Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (33068b)

SITUATION A hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model cannot treat a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose as incidental context on post-deployment drift report the owner never signed. EU AI Act implementation manager must close the hiring tool should from that extract under AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems.

DECISION EU AI Act implementation manager in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose is noise around an already-controlled Vendors and Agentic Systems process in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model, given post-deployment drift report the owner never signed. 2. A new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose is the event in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed that forces Policy or governance breach for EU AI Act implementation manager under AI Governance. 3. Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed shows a one-file miss after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose, not a Vendors and Agentic Systems program failure. 4. Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed cannot decide the hiring tool should yet after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose; hold is the only AI Governance close a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Reproduce the incident row in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and say whether it ever touched production data. 2. Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed. 3. Reproduce the incident row in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and say whether it ever touched production data. 4. For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read post-deployment drift report the owner never signed against a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose and write the one fact that would move the hiring tool should for EU AI Act implementation manager.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose). Lead with the AI Governance option post-deployment drift report the owner never signed can support after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for EU AI Act implementation manager in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model.