Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (204fb0)

SITUATION In a bank preparing for a model-risk exam, post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is the evidence after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed. Board AI liaison has to pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems close using post-deployment drift report the owner never signed.

DECISION Board AI liaison in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Board AI liaison can defend Policy or governance breach from post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed in a AI Governance challenge. 2. Board AI liaison cannot defend Policy or governance breach from post-deployment drift report the owner never signed; Model defect is what the extract actually supports after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed. 3. A near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed never reached the population in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed — reopen intake, do not close the hiring tool should. 4. Two facts in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed conflict for board AI liaison; hold this Vendors and Agentic Systems file.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Reproduce the incident row in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and say whether it ever touched production data. 2. Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed. 3. Reproduce the incident row in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and say whether it ever touched production data. 4. For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read post-deployment drift report the owner never signed against a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed and write the one fact that would move the hiring tool should for board AI liaison.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed). The follow-on Vendors and Agentic Systems action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the hiring tool should, then the evidence in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed, then the action for board AI liaison - Hypothesis scorecard against post-deployment drift report the owner never signed: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for board AI liaison in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam - What changes the hiring tool should if a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed is later withdrawn