Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (bc13f4)

SITUATION Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality arrived with two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file for post-deployment monitoring owner. That is a AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms decision on the control plane actually in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.

DECISION Post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is noise around an already-controlled Audit and Vendor Terms process in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy, given reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality. 2. Two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is the event in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality that forces Policy or governance breach for post-deployment monitoring owner under AI Governance Layer. 3. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality shows a one-file miss after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file, not a Audit and Vendor Terms program failure. 4. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality cannot decide the control plane actually yet after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a publisher needing provenance on generated copy can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality to the policy gate post-deployment monitoring owner can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let the control plane actually proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move the control plane actually for post-deployment monitoring owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality can support after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for post-deployment monitoring owner in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.