Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (8e6167)

SITUATION Price-to-win analyst is responsible for past performance will score in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP, using OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate as the only working extract. A subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit is what reset the timeline for this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file.

DECISION Price-to-win analyst in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate is the one a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit named, so Past performance will score follows for this Compliance and Cyber Requirements file. 2. The population in OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate is adjacent only to a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit; Be deemed not relevant is the honest Government RFP call. 3. An 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP already contained a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit before OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate arrived; no new Compliance and Cyber Requirements path. 4. Provenance on OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit is broken; do not pick Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score competitive posture if price-to-win analyst pursues, partners, or no-bids. 2. Test OCI, QASP, and mandatory evaluation rights an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP cannot waive quietly. 3. Map Section L/M requirements in OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate to evaluator notes after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit. 4. For this Government RFP Compliance and Cyber Requirements file, read OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate against a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for price-to-win analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Compliance and Cyber Requirements packet (OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit). Lead with the Government RFP option OCI mitigation plan that names the wrong affiliate can support after a subcontracting goal the supply base cannot hit, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for price-to-win analyst in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP.