Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (b57a73)

SITUATION After a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores, past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is what proposal compliance lead can touch in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP. Government RFP will live with Pursue versus Pursue with conditions on this Capture and Pricing file.

DECISION Proposal compliance lead in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP must choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid using past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard reads as Pursue once a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores is lined up to the same Government RFP population. 2. Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is closer to Pursue with conditions after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores; Pursue would over-claim this Capture and Pricing extract. 3. Partner is still live in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard for proposal compliance lead in an 8(a) teaming on a civilian shared-services RFP. 4. Past-performance recency and relevance scorecard is missing the fact proposal compliance lead needs after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores; stop this Government RFP close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map Section L/M requirements in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard to evaluator notes after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores. 2. Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what past-performance recency and relevance scorecard attaches. 3. Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs the SBIR data-rights assertions. 4. For this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file, read past-performance recency and relevance scorecard against a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores and write the one fact that would move the SBIR data-rights assertions for proposal compliance lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Pursue / Pursue with conditions / Partner / No-bid on this Government RFP / Capture and Pricing packet (past-performance recency and relevance scorecard after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores). The follow-on Capture and Pricing action is what proposal compliance lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Government RFP option on the SBIR data-rights assertions, then the evidence in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard, then the action for proposal compliance lead - Hypothesis scorecard against past-performance recency and relevance scorecard: supported / rejected / untestable - Regulatory or exam hook Capture and Pricing would cite - Capture and Pricing finding in past-performance recency and relevance scorecard that a second reviewer can re-perform