Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (8519bc)

SITUATION A live AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file in a hospital committee that never records dissent now turns on reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. Decision-audit designer should state what that extract proves for whether the control plane actually controls production traffic.

DECISION Decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent must choose Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure, Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show. The question on that file is whether the control plane actually controls production traffic.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality reads as Policy or governance breach once drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is closer to Model defect after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Audit and Vendor Terms extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality for decision-audit designer in a hospital committee that never records dissent. 4. Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is missing the fact decision-audit designer needs after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 2. Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 3. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a hospital committee that never records dissent. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show and write the one fact that would move the control plane actually for decision-audit designer.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after drift in a protected class the dashboard does not show). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what decision-audit designer does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.