Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (c3619a)

Situation

In an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance, teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is the evidence after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor. Contracts officer supporting a bid has to pick Past performance will score or Be deemed not relevant for this Government RFP Capture and Pricing close using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes.

Decision

Contracts officer supporting a bid in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Past performance will score now; teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes already has the discriminator after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor.
• Keep Be deemed not relevant in force until teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes is completed after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor for contracts officer supporting a bid.
• Treat teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes as Past performance will score because both readings appear after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor.
• Refuse a Government RFP close: contracts officer supporting a bid does not have the page past performance will score turns on in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes.

Analysis required

• Map Section L/M requirements in teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes to evaluator notes after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• For this Government RFP Capture and Pricing file, read teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes against a government estimate that is 30% below your floor and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for contracts officer supporting a bid.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Capture and Pricing packet (teaming agreement with IP and workshare holes after a government estimate that is 30% below your floor). The follow-on Capture and Pricing action is what contracts officer supporting a bid does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.