Assess whether an alternate source is technically qualified (1bdb13)

SITUATION A condemnation cluster after a process change put scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN in front of repair-vs-buy decision support lead in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources. This Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence decision is an alternate source is from scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN, and the live options are Fund and move materiel, Cannibalize or substitute, Defer a cycle.

DECISION Repair-vs-buy decision support lead in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN after a condemnation cluster after a process change.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN reads as Fund and move materiel once a condemnation cluster after a process change is lined up to the same Defense Sustainment population. 2. Scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN is closer to Cannibalize or substitute after a condemnation cluster after a process change; Fund and move materiel would over-claim this Depot Procurement Intelligence extract. 3. Defer a cycle is still live in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN for repair-vs-buy decision support lead in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources. 4. Scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN is missing the fact repair-vs-buy decision support lead needs after a condemnation cluster after a process change; stop this Defense Sustainment close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Trace the funding or cannibalization line that would actually move scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN. 2. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 3. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN against a condemnation cluster after a process change and write the one fact that would move an alternate source is for repair-vs-buy decision support lead.

RECOMMENDATION The actionable close on scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN is Fund and move materiel if a condemnation cluster after a process change left a complete Depot Procurement Intelligence trail; otherwise Cannibalize or substitute. Repair-vs-buy decision support lead should cite the specific line in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN that settles an alternate source is before anyone else acts in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on an alternate source is, then the evidence in scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN, then the action for repair-vs-buy decision support lead - Hypothesis scorecard against scrap-and-condemnation spike on one NSN: supported / rejected / untestable - Owner and next date for repair-vs-buy decision support lead in an engineering support activity reviewing alternate sources - What changes an alternate source is if a condemnation cluster after a process change is later withdrawn