Assess whether the committee can overrule a business unit (7ccefa)

SITUATION The working file is decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice. AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy has to name Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is noise around an already-controlled Lifecycle and Accountability process in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy, given decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step. 2. A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is the event in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step that forces Policy or governance breach for AI committee secretariat under AI Governance Layer. 3. Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step shows a one-file miss after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, not a Lifecycle and Accountability program failure. 4. Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step cannot decide the committee can overrule yet after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a publisher needing provenance on generated copy can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. 3. Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move the committee can overrule for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.