Assess whether comparative files show second-review bias (95868f)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Exam-response coordinator in a manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files has one working extract — SPCP written plan versus actual originations — after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP. If SPCP written plan versus actual originations cannot support comparative files show second-review, the honest Fair Lending output is hold.
Decision
Exam-response coordinator in a manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files must choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold using SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in SPCP written plan versus actual originations is the one a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP named, so Remove access or reverse the item follows for this CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file.
- The population in SPCP written plan versus actual originations is adjacent only to a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP; Temporary compensating control is the honest Fair Lending call.
- A manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files already contained a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP before SPCP written plan versus actual originations arrived; no new CRA and Special-Purpose Programs path.
- Provenance on SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP is broken; do not pick Remove access or reverse the item or Temporary compensating control yet.
Analysis required
- Test a documented exception versus a pattern a manufactured-housing lender with dealer-originated files must defend.
- Match the adverse-action language to the facts in SPCP written plan versus actual originations.
- Check HMDA coding and underwriting policy against comparative files show second-review.
- For this Fair Lending CRA and Special-Purpose Programs file, read SPCP written plan versus actual originations against a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP and write the one fact that would move comparative files show second-review for exam-response coordinator.
Recommendation
Choose Remove access or reverse the item / Temporary compensating control / Approve a documented exception / Hold on this Fair Lending / CRA and Special-Purpose Programs packet (SPCP written plan versus actual originations after a branch that stopped taking applications in one ZIP). The follow-on CRA and Special-Purpose Programs action is what exam-response coordinator does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.
Explore more
More Fair Lending prompts
- Assess whether pricing disparities are justified by legitimate factors
- Assess whether line assignments have a disparate impact the bank will defend
- Assess whether dealer overlays introduce prohibited steering (1db1c2)
- Assess whether a model update needs a fair-lending revalidation (b396ed)
- Assess whether to pause a product pending a lookback (f91b84)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

