Assess whether cost history can support a fair-and-reasonable call (e8ad0c)

SITUATION After a condemnation cluster after a process change, repair-history file that will not tie to cost is what obsolescence and DMSMS analyst can touch in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. Defense Sustainment will live with Fund and move materiel versus Cannibalize or substitute on this Depot Procurement Intelligence file.

DECISION Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract must choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold using repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a condemnation cluster after a process change.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Obsolescence and DMSMS analyst owns cost history can support on repair-history file that will not tie to cost: take Fund and move materiel when a condemnation cluster after a process change left a reconstructable Depot Procurement Intelligence trail in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. 2. Take Cannibalize or substitute when repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a condemnation cluster after a process change cannot reconstruct that Depot Procurement Intelligence trail. 3. Repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a condemnation cluster after a process change is a cutoff or timing miss in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract, not Fund and move materiel. 4. Do not close cost history can support from repair-history file that will not tie to cost while the Defense Sustainment fact obsolescence and DMSMS analyst would cite is still absent.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Test whether the shortfall is materiel, maintenance posting, or a bad count. 2. Compare on-hand, due-in, and condemned quantities in repair-history file that will not tie to cost. 3. Quantify mission impact if cost history can support is deferred one cycle in a workload that shifted from organic repair to contract. 4. For this Defense Sustainment Depot Procurement Intelligence file, read repair-history file that will not tie to cost against a condemnation cluster after a process change and write the one fact that would move cost history can support for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Fund and move materiel / Cannibalize or substitute / Defer a cycle / Hold on this Defense Sustainment / Depot Procurement Intelligence packet (repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a condemnation cluster after a process change). The follow-on Depot Procurement Intelligence action is what obsolescence and DMSMS analyst does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line Defense Sustainment option on cost history can support, then the evidence in repair-history file that will not tie to cost, then the action for obsolescence and DMSMS analyst - Hypothesis scorecard against repair-history file that will not tie to cost: supported / rejected / untestable - Depot Procurement Intelligence finding in repair-history file that will not tie to cost that a second reviewer can re-perform - Missing page in repair-history file that will not tie to cost after a condemnation cluster after a process change, if any