Assess whether deprecation will strand a downstream process (b9371d)

Situation

AI committee secretariat owns deprecation will strand a inside a publisher needing provenance on generated copy with decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step as the only packet. A vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is what changed the clock for this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file.

Decision

AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice.

Hypotheses to test

• Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step reads as Policy or governance breach once a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population.
• Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step is closer to Model defect after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Lifecycle and Accountability extract.
• Dual failure is still live in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step for AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.
• Decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step is missing the fact AI committee secretariat needs after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

Analysis required

• Map the control-plane score in decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step to the policy gate AI committee secretariat can enforce.
• Name the override that would let deprecation will strand a proceed without a silent bypass.
• Test whether a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path.
• For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step against a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice and write the one fact that would move deprecation will strand a for AI committee secretariat.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice). Lead with the AI Governance Layer option decision-audit trail with gaps at the human-gate step can support after a vendor that changed subprocessors without notice, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy.