Assess whether disagreement should block, queue, or log (f63747)

SITUATION Multi-model reconciliation lead in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor has one working extract — enterprise AI risk register with missing owners — after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file. If enterprise AI risk register with missing owners cannot support disagreement should block, queue,, the only defensible AI Governance Layer output is hold.

DECISION Multi-model reconciliation lead in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor must choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log using enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Authorize Disagreement should block, queue, now; enterprise AI risk register with missing owners already has the discriminator after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file. 2. Keep Log in force until enterprise AI risk register with missing owners is completed after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file for multi-model reconciliation lead. 3. Treat enterprise AI risk register with missing owners as Disagreement should block, queue, because both readings appear after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file. 4. Refuse a AI Governance Layer close: multi-model reconciliation lead does not have the decision disagreement should block, queue, turns on in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor. 2. Map the control-plane score in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners to the policy gate multi-model reconciliation lead can enforce. 3. Name the override that would let disagreement should block, queue, proceed without a silent bypass. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read enterprise AI risk register with missing owners against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move disagreement should block, queue, for multi-model reconciliation lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Disagreement should block, queue, / Log on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (enterprise AI risk register with missing owners after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). The follow-on Audit and Vendor Terms action is what multi-model reconciliation lead does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance Layer option on disagreement should block, queue,, then the evidence in enterprise AI risk register with missing owners, then the action for multi-model reconciliation lead - Hypothesis scorecard against enterprise AI risk register with missing owners: supported / rejected / untestable - Named option among Disagreement should block, queue,, Log and the fact that kills the others - Owner and next date for multi-model reconciliation lead in an enterprise that just bought an AI 'control plane' vendor