Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (7d7f89)

SITUATION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner owns this Lifecycle and Accountability review in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. Two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is the triggering event; vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors is the evidence for whether vendor terms allow customer data in training.

DECISION Vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. Vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors reads as Policy or governance breach once two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population. 2. Vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors is closer to Model defect after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Lifecycle and Accountability extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 4. Vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors is missing the fact vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner needs after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Score whether the agent action in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 2. Confirm the inventory line still matches the running configuration in a manufacturer sunsetting a vision model still used in QA. 3. Map the control-plane score in vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors to the policy gate vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner can enforce. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors against two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (vendor MSA clauses on training, indemnity, and subprocessors after two production models recommending opposite actions on the same file). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what vendor-contract AI counsel's operations partner does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.