Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (345211)

Situation

In a city using a hiring-screen algorithm, EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is the evidence after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased. Board AI liaison has to pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Bias and Training Data close using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.

Decision

Board AI liaison in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased.

Hypotheses to test

• EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet reads as Policy or governance breach once a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased is lined up to the same AI Governance population.
• EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is closer to Model defect after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Bias and Training Data extract.
• Dual failure is still live in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet for board AI liaison in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm.
• EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is missing the fact board AI liaison needs after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased; stop this AI Governance close.

Analysis required

• Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
• Reproduce the incident row in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and say whether it ever touched production data.
• Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet.
• For this AI Governance Bias and Training Data file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased and write the one fact that would move the hiring tool should for board AI liaison.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Bias and Training Data packet (EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a journalist asking if the hiring tool is biased). The follow-on Bias and Training Data action is what board AI liaison does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on the hiring tool should, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for board AI liaison
• Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable
• Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others
• Owner and next date for board AI liaison in a city using a hiring-screen algorithm