Assess whether the hiring tool should be paused pending audit (476d35)

SITUATION HR analytics governance lead in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam has one working extract — hiring-tool adverse-impact tables — after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed. If hiring-tool adverse-impact tables cannot support the hiring tool should, the only defensible AI Governance output is hold.

DECISION HR analytics governance lead in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. A near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed is noise around an already-controlled Policy and Oversight process in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam, given hiring-tool adverse-impact tables. 2. A near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed is the event in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables that forces Policy or governance breach for HR analytics governance lead under AI Governance. 3. Hiring-tool adverse-impact tables shows a one-file miss after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed, not a Policy and Oversight program failure. 4. Hiring-tool adverse-impact tables cannot decide the hiring tool should yet after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed; hold is the only AI Governance close a bank preparing for a model-risk exam can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed. 2. Map the approved-use case to the system the hiring tool should would bind. 3. Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read hiring-tool adverse-impact tables against a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed and write the one fact that would move the hiring tool should for HR analytics governance lead.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Policy and Oversight packet (hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed). Lead with the AI Governance option hiring-tool adverse-impact tables can support after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for HR analytics governance lead in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the hiring tool should, then the evidence in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables, then the action for HR analytics governance lead - Hypothesis scorecard against hiring-tool adverse-impact tables: supported / rejected / untestable - Missing page in hiring-tool adverse-impact tables after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed, if any - Regulatory or exam hook Policy and Oversight would cite