Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (4ecba3)

Situation

Capture manager owns past performance will score inside an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance with shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps as the only packet. A debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores is what changed the clock for this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file.

Decision

Capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores.

Hypotheses to test

• Shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps reads as Past performance will score once a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores is lined up to the same Government RFP population.
• Shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is closer to Be deemed not relevant after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores; Past performance will score would over-claim this Performance and Teaming extract.
• A dual reading is still live in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps for capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.
• Shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps is missing the fact capture manager needs after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores; stop this Government RFP close.

Analysis required

• Map Section L/M requirements in shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps to evaluator notes after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores.
• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps against a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for capture manager.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores). Lead with the Government RFP option shall-statement compliance matrix with gaps can support after a debrief that contradicts the evaluation-notice scores, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for capture manager in an incumbent defending a recompete with thin past performance.