Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (505799)

Situation

Small-business subcontracting plan short of goals arrived with a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS for CMMC implementation lead. That is a Government RFP Protest and Modifications decision on past performance will score in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft.

Decision

CMMC implementation lead in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using small-business subcontracting plan short of goals after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS.

Hypotheses to test

• Small-business subcontracting plan short of goals reads as Past performance will score once a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS is lined up to the same Government RFP population.
• Small-business subcontracting plan short of goals is closer to Be deemed not relevant after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS; Past performance will score would over-claim this Protest and Modifications extract.
• A dual reading is still live in small-business subcontracting plan short of goals for CMMC implementation lead in a joint venture with an uneven workshare draft.
• Small-business subcontracting plan short of goals is missing the fact CMMC implementation lead needs after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS; stop this Government RFP close.

Analysis required

• Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what small-business subcontracting plan short of goals attaches.
• Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
• Score competitive posture if CMMC implementation lead pursues, partners, or no-bids.
• For this Government RFP Protest and Modifications file, read small-business subcontracting plan short of goals against a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for CMMC implementation lead.

Recommendation

Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Protest and Modifications packet (small-business subcontracting plan short of goals after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS). If small-business subcontracting plan short of goals cannot force a Government RFP label under Protest and Modifications, stop. If small-business subcontracting plan short of goals after a modification adding cybersecurity work not in the PWS cannot support Past performance will score versus Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP Protest and Modifications close, CMMC implementation lead must identify the Section L/M or evaluation criterion that remains unproven rather than filling the gap.