Assess whether procurement should fail a vendor lacking eval rights (d187ab)

SITUATION The working file is multi-model disagreement log on production cases after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'. Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights has to name Policy or governance breach or Model defect for this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file.

DECISION Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using multi-model disagreement log on production cases after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. The population in multi-model disagreement log on production cases is the one a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Audit and Vendor Terms file. 2. The population in multi-model disagreement log on production cases is adjacent only to a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'; Model defect is the honest AI Governance Layer call. 3. A firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights already contained a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' before multi-model disagreement log on production cases arrived; no new Audit and Vendor Terms path. 4. Provenance on multi-model disagreement log on production cases after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Map the control-plane score in multi-model disagreement log on production cases to the policy gate enterprise AI control-plane owner can enforce. 2. Name the override that would let procurement should fail a proceed without a silent bypass. 3. Test whether a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read multi-model disagreement log on production cases against a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' and write the one fact that would move procurement should fail a for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (multi-model disagreement log on production cases after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable'). If multi-model disagreement log on production cases cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Audit and Vendor Terms, stop. If multi-model disagreement log on production cases after a scorecard that rated 100% of outputs 'acceptable' cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms close, enterprise AI control-plane owner must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.