Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (8c9633)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Chief AI officer in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam has one working extract — agentic-workflow permission matrix — after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose. If agentic-workflow permission matrix cannot support a shadow system must, the honest AI Governance output is hold.
Decision
Chief AI officer in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using agentic-workflow permission matrix after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Policy or governance breach now; agentic-workflow permission matrix already has the discriminator after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
- Keep Model defect in force until agentic-workflow permission matrix is completed after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose for chief AI officer.
- Treat agentic-workflow permission matrix as Dual failure because both readings appear after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
- Refuse a AI Governance close: chief AI officer does not have the page a shadow system must turns on in agentic-workflow permission matrix.
Analysis required
- Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
- Map the approved-use case to the system a shadow system must would bind.
- Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose.
- For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read agentic-workflow permission matrix against a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for chief AI officer.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (agentic-workflow permission matrix after a new use case bolted onto a model approved for a narrower purpose). If agentic-workflow permission matrix cannot force a AI Governance label under Inventory and Regulatory Fit, stop. Do not invent pages a bank preparing for a model-risk exam does not have.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- HR analytics governance lead must resolve whether an agent may take actions
- Whether an agent may take actions without a human gate from explainability
- Whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam from generative-AI
- Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (f7ff1d)
- Assess whether a generative-AI incident is a policy breach or a model defect
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

