Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (e23136)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
EU AI Act implementation manager in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor has one working extract — incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo — after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region. If incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo cannot support a shadow system must, the honest AI Governance output is hold.
Decision
EU AI Act implementation manager in a university licensing an AI proctoring vendor must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is the one a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region named, so Policy or governance breach follows for this Inventory and Regulatory Fit file.
- The population in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is adjacent only to a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region; Model defect is the honest AI Governance call.
- A university licensing an AI proctoring vendor already contained a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region before incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo arrived; no new Inventory and Regulatory Fit path.
- Provenance on incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region is broken; do not pick Policy or governance breach or Model defect yet.
Analysis required
- Map the approved-use case to the system a shadow system must would bind.
- Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region.
- Map the approved-use case to the system a shadow system must would bind.
- For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo against a vendor SOC report that excludes the actual model host region and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for EU AI Act implementation manager.
Recommendation
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Board AI liaison must resolve whether the vendor can be used in a regulated
- Has the Board Been Accurately Briefed — Insurer Scoring Claims
- Whether a generative-AI incident is a policy breach or a model defect from EU
- Whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act from agentic-workflow
- Is System High-risk Under the EU AI Act?
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether the control plane actually controls production traffic (d8acc8)AI Governance Layer
- Assess whether audits can reconstruct who authorized what (5cd06d)AI Governance Layer
- Assess whether generated content is attributable enough for regulatorsAI Governance Layer
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

