Assess whether a subrecipient should be suspended (d4df23)

Situation

In a reorganization that moves programs across bureaus, hearing Q-and-A that conflicts with the published plan is the evidence after a grant condition OIG says was never monitored. Performance-management analyst has to pick Pay or continue or Recoup for this Government Policy and Grants close using hearing Q-and-A that conflicts with the published plan.

Decision

Performance-management analyst in a reorganization that moves programs across bureaus must choose Pay or continue / Recoup / Deny / Hold using hearing Q-and-A that conflicts with the published plan after a grant condition OIG says was never monitored.

Hypotheses to test

• Hearing Q-and-A that conflicts with the published plan lines up with a grant condition OIG says was never monitored for Pay or continue on a subrecipient should be suspended; performance-management analyst in a reorganization that moves programs across bureaus can execute that path.
• Hearing Q-and-A that conflicts with the published plan conflicts with a grant condition OIG says was never monitored for Pay or continue, so Recoup is the Government move on this Policy and Grants packet.
• Trace the audit trail performance-management analyst would produce for oversight. would move a subrecipient should be suspended only if it appears in hearing Q-and-A that conflicts with the published plan after a grant condition OIG says was never monitored.
• Performance-management analyst should treat hearing Q-and-A that conflicts with the published plan as incomplete for a subrecipient should be suspended rather than borrow a label from another a reorganization that moves programs across bureaus file.

Analysis required

• Trace the audit trail performance-management analyst would produce for oversight.
• Map eligibility, appropriation, and program rules in hearing Q-and-A that conflicts with the published plan after a grant condition OIG says was never monitored.
• Name the statutory hook that hearing Q-and-A that conflicts with the published plan does or does not support.
• For this Government Policy and Grants file, read hearing Q-and-A that conflicts with the published plan against a grant condition OIG says was never monitored and write the one fact that would move a subrecipient should be suspended for performance-management analyst.

Recommendation