Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (ad27f6)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Inventory and Regulatory Fit work in a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents now turns on the system is high-risk because an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty put incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo in play. Exam-readiness coordinator should say what incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo proves.
Decision
Exam-readiness coordinator in a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty.
Hypotheses to test
- Authorize Policy or governance breach now; incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo already has the discriminator after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty.
- Keep Model defect in force until incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo is completed after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty for exam-readiness coordinator.
- Treat incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo as Dual failure because both readings appear after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty.
- Refuse a AI Governance close: exam-readiness coordinator does not have the page the system is high-risk turns on in incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo.
Analysis required
- Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty.
- Map the approved-use case to the system the system is high-risk would bind.
- Check intended purpose and inventory status against EU AI Act / exam-readiness language after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty.
- For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo against an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for exam-readiness coordinator.
Recommendation
Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty). Lead with the AI Governance option incident log of hallucinated citations in a legal memo can support after an internal audit finding that human review logs are empty, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for exam-readiness coordinator in a pharma company using LLMs on trial documents.
Explore more
More AI Governance prompts
- Exam-readiness coordinator must resolve whether training data has a lawful
- Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap
- Model-risk officer must resolve whether an agent may take actions without
- Board AI liaison must resolve whether a generative-AI incident is a policy
- Assess whether deprecation of a legacy scorecard creates a governance gap
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

