Assess whether vendor terms allow customer data in training (b4a7f6)

SITUATION After an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output, content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy is what AI committee secretariat can touch in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy. AI Governance Layer will live with Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this Lifecycle and Accountability file.

DECISION AI committee secretariat in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. An examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output is noise around an already-controlled Lifecycle and Accountability process in a publisher needing provenance on generated copy, given content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy. 2. An examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output is the event in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy that forces Policy or governance breach for AI committee secretariat under AI Governance Layer. 3. Content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy shows a one-file miss after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output, not a Lifecycle and Accountability program failure. 4. Content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy cannot decide vendor terms allow customer yet after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output; hold is the only AI Governance Layer close a publisher needing provenance on generated copy can defend.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Name the override that would let vendor terms allow customer proceed without a silent bypass. 2. Test whether an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path. 3. Score whether the agent action in content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged. 4. For this AI Governance Layer Lifecycle and Accountability file, read content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy against an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output and write the one fact that would move vendor terms allow customer for AI committee secretariat.

RECOMMENDATION Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Lifecycle and Accountability packet (content-attribution tags missing on customer-facing copy after an examiner asking who authorized last Tuesday's model output). The follow-on Lifecycle and Accountability action is what AI committee secretariat does next: implement the option, assign an owner, and log the missing fact.