Assess whether agents must have a human gate for external actions (89265f)

Situation

Enterprise AI control-plane owner owns agents must have a human gate inside a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights with reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality as the only packet. A batch job still calling a retired endpoint is what changed the clock for this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file.

Decision

Enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint.

Hypotheses to test

• Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality reads as Policy or governance breach once a batch job still calling a retired endpoint is lined up to the same AI Governance Layer population.
• Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is closer to Model defect after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Audit and Vendor Terms extract.
• Dual failure is still live in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality for enterprise AI control-plane owner in a firm whose vendor MSA is silent on training rights.
• Reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality is missing the fact enterprise AI control-plane owner needs after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint; stop this AI Governance Layer close.

Analysis required

• Name the override that would let agents must have a human gate proceed without a silent bypass.
• Test whether a batch job still calling a retired endpoint changed routing, logging, or human-in-the-loop on the live agent path.
• Score whether the agent action in reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality was in-policy, out-of-policy, or unlogged.
• For this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms file, read reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality against a batch job still calling a retired endpoint and write the one fact that would move agents must have a human gate for enterprise AI control-plane owner.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance Layer / Audit and Vendor Terms packet (reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint). If reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality cannot force a AI Governance Layer label under Audit and Vendor Terms, stop. If reconciliation policy when two models split on materiality after a batch job still calling a retired endpoint cannot support Policy or governance breach versus Model defect on this AI Governance Layer Audit and Vendor Terms close, enterprise AI control-plane owner must leave the classification unresolved and name the missing control or provenance fact.