Assess whether a shadow system must be decommissioned this quarter (6a357c)

Situation

A near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed put post-deployment drift report the owner never signed in front of EU AI Act implementation manager in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model. This AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems close is a shadow system must from post-deployment drift report the owner never signed, and the live options are Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure.

Decision

EU AI Act implementation manager in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.

Hypotheses to test

• Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed reads as Policy or governance breach once a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed is lined up to the same AI Governance population.
• Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is closer to Model defect after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Vendors and Agentic Systems extract.
• Dual failure is still live in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed for EU AI Act implementation manager in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model.
• Post-deployment drift report the owner never signed is missing the fact EU AI Act implementation manager needs after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed; stop this AI Governance close.

Analysis required

• Walk the model input/output path recorded in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate EU AI Act implementation manager can actually point to.
• Walk the model input/output path recorded in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged.
• For this AI Governance Vendors and Agentic Systems file, read post-deployment drift report the owner never signed against a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed and write the one fact that would move a shadow system must for EU AI Act implementation manager.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Vendors and Agentic Systems packet (post-deployment drift report the owner never signed after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed). Lead with the AI Governance option post-deployment drift report the owner never signed can support after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for EU AI Act implementation manager in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model.

Command returns

• Bottom-line AI Governance option on a shadow system must, then the evidence in post-deployment drift report the owner never signed, then the action for EU AI Act implementation manager
• Hypothesis scorecard against post-deployment drift report the owner never signed: supported / rejected / untestable
• Owner and next date for EU AI Act implementation manager in a hospital deploying a sepsis-risk model
• What changes a shadow system must if a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed is later withdrawn