Assess whether explainability artifacts would survive an exam (deb1cb)

Situation

A bank preparing for a model-risk exam cannot treat an examiner request for the current model inventory as color commentary on generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft. Chief AI officer must close explainability artifacts would survive from that extract under AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit.

Decision

Chief AI officer in a bank preparing for a model-risk exam must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft after an examiner request for the current model inventory.

Hypotheses to test

• Authorize Policy or governance breach now; generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft already has the discriminator after an examiner request for the current model inventory.
• Keep Model defect in force until generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft is completed after an examiner request for the current model inventory for chief AI officer.
• Treat generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft as Dual failure because both readings appear after an examiner request for the current model inventory.
• Refuse a AI Governance close: chief AI officer does not have the page explainability artifacts would survive turns on in generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft.

Analysis required

• Reproduce the incident row in generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft and say whether it ever touched production data.
• Split policy-or-governance failure from a model defect using prompts, outputs, and human edits in generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft.
• Reproduce the incident row in generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft and say whether it ever touched production data.
• For this AI Governance Inventory and Regulatory Fit file, read generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft against an examiner request for the current model inventory and write the one fact that would move explainability artifacts would survive for chief AI officer.

Recommendation

Choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact on this AI Governance / Inventory and Regulatory Fit packet (generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft after an examiner request for the current model inventory). If generative-AI acceptable-use policy draft cannot force a AI Governance label under Inventory and Regulatory Fit, stop. Do not invent pages a bank preparing for a model-risk exam does not have.