Assess whether past performance will score or be deemed not relevant (6b9e13)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate arrived with an incumbent protest rumor on the street for contracts officer supporting a bid. That is a Government RFP Performance and Teaming decision on past performance will score in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR.
Decision
Contracts officer supporting a bid in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR must choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant using price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate after an incumbent protest rumor on the street.
Hypotheses to test
- Price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate reads as Past performance will score once an incumbent protest rumor on the street is lined up to the same Government RFP population.
- Price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate is closer to Be deemed not relevant after an incumbent protest rumor on the street; Past performance will score would over-claim this Performance and Teaming extract.
- A dual reading is still live in price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate for contracts officer supporting a bid in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR.
- Price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate is missing the fact contracts officer supporting a bid needs after an incumbent protest rumor on the street; stop this Government RFP close.
Analysis required
- Compare teaming and past-performance claims to what price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate attaches.
- Normalize pricing and exceptions against the solicitation that governs past performance will score.
- Score competitive posture if contracts officer supporting a bid pursues, partners, or no-bids.
- For this Government RFP Performance and Teaming file, read price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate against an incumbent protest rumor on the street and write the one fact that would move past performance will score for contracts officer supporting a bid.
Recommendation
Choose Past performance will score / Be deemed not relevant on this Government RFP / Performance and Teaming packet (price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate after an incumbent protest rumor on the street). Lead with the Government RFP option price-to-win versus independent government cost estimate can support after an incumbent protest rumor on the street, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for contracts officer supporting a bid in a lab competing a Phase II SBIR.
Explore more
More Government RFP prompts
- Assess whether the teaming structure creates OCI or workshare risk (7445ee)
- Assess whether to bid as prime, sub, or no-bid (447eaf)
- Assess whether key personnel substitutions will trigger evaluation risk
- Assess whether the SBIR data-rights assertions are too aggressive (aaef34)
- Assess whether Section M scoring math was applied consistently (2cd305)
Explore related decision areas
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

