Assess whether the system is high-risk under the EU AI Act (561d9e)

SITUATION EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet arrived with a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed for board AI liaison. That is a AI Governance Policy and Oversight decision on the system is high-risk in a retailer using generative AI in customer service.

DECISION Board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service must choose Policy or governance breach / Model defect / Dual failure / Hold for the missing fact using EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed.

HYPOTHESES TO TEST 1. EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet reads as Policy or governance breach once a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed is lined up to the same AI Governance population. 2. EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is closer to Model defect after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed; Policy or governance breach would over-claim this Policy and Oversight extract. 3. Dual failure is still live in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet for board AI liaison in a retailer using generative AI in customer service. 4. EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet is missing the fact board AI liaison needs after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed; stop this AI Governance close.

ANALYSIS REQUIRED 1. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate board AI liaison can actually point to. 2. Walk the model input/output path recorded in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet and mark each hop approved, shadow, or unlogged. 3. Verify data provenance and the human-oversight gate board AI liaison can actually point to. 4. For this AI Governance Policy and Oversight file, read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet against a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed and write the one fact that would move the system is high-risk for board AI liaison.

RECOMMENDATION Start from the open question on EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet reads as Policy or governance breach once a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed is lined up to t Then read EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet after a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed. Board AI liaison takes Policy or governance breach only if that extract answers it for this AI Governance Policy and Oversight case in a retailer using generative AI in customer service; otherwise stay on Model defect.

COMMAND RETURNS - Bottom-line AI Governance option on the system is high-risk, then the evidence in EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet, then the action for board AI liaison - Hypothesis scorecard against EU AI Act high-risk classification worksheet: supported / rejected / untestable - What changes the system is high-risk if a near-miss where an agent emailed a customer unreviewed is later withdrawn - Named option among Policy or governance breach, Model defect, Dual failure and the fact that kills the others