Assess whether a top customer is actually sticky (62d019)
August 31, 2026 · SmartSolo
Situation
Regulatory-approval critical-path calendar arrived with a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist for customer-contract risk reviewer. That is a M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts decision on a top customer is actually sticky in a public acquirer facing HSR and sector regulators.
Decision
Customer-contract risk reviewer in a public acquirer facing HSR and sector regulators must choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold using regulatory-approval critical-path calendar after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist.
Hypotheses to test
- The population in regulatory-approval critical-path calendar is the one a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist named, so Proceed follows for this People and Contracts file.
- The population in regulatory-approval critical-path calendar is adjacent only to a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist; Reprice is the honest M&A Due Diligence call.
- A public acquirer facing HSR and sector regulators already contained a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist before regulatory-approval critical-path calendar arrived; no new People and Contracts path.
- Provenance on regulatory-approval critical-path calendar after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist is broken; do not pick Proceed or Reprice yet.
Analysis required
- Map reps, earnout mechanics, and integration risk a public acquirer facing HSR and sector regulators would inherit.
- Tie quality-of-earnings, working-capital, and contingent items in regulatory-approval critical-path calendar to a top customer is actually sticky.
- Name the document customer-contract risk reviewer still needs before signing.
- For this M&A Due Diligence People and Contracts file, read regulatory-approval critical-path calendar against a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist and write the one fact that would move a top customer is actually sticky for customer-contract risk reviewer.
Recommendation
Choose Proceed / Reprice / Walk / Hold on this M&A Due Diligence / People and Contracts packet (regulatory-approval critical-path calendar after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist). Lead with the M&A Due Diligence option regulatory-approval critical-path calendar can support after a TSA that expires before replacement systems exist, then the two facts that force it, then the Monday action for customer-contract risk reviewer in a public acquirer facing HSR and sector regulators.
Explore more
More M&A Due Diligence prompts
- Assess whether working capital should be a walk-away (edf227)
- Assess whether the carve-out is operable on day one after a CIM that omitted
- Assess whether related-party sales should be backed out of valuation (57cc81)
- Assess whether regulatory approval is a timing risk or a deal risk (ee8392)
- Assess whether integration costs were sandbagged in the CIM (5bd236)
Explore related decision areas
- Assess whether a modification is in-scope or a new procurement (fe3837)Government RFP
- Assess whether cyber controls claimed are actually in force (fb8213)Insurance Underwriting
- Assess whether pollution coverage should be site-specific or blanket (7641bb)Insurance Underwriting
See governed multi-model AI on your own prompt
Compare GPT-5, Claude, and Gemini side by side, with human review and a decision record built in.

